Porsche 911 Turbo 2013-2019 review

Open gallery Close by Matt Prior 5 February 2014 Follow @matty_prior Share

How we test cars

The Porsche 911 Turbo, then. It’s not always our favourite flavour of Porsche 911, but it’s usually the most devastating.

If a 911 GT3 is about involvement, feel and motorsport-derived gratification, a 911 Turbo is about something very different. It’s for those who like to travel very quickly with minimal effort and ample safety and comfort, with a poised chassis beneath them.

The original 911 Turbo was defined by its ‘whale tail’ spoilerMatt PriorEditor-at-large

The Turbo wasn’t always this way. Porsche set a theme with the first 911 Turbo, codenamed 930, of 1975. At first, the 3.0-litre car had ‘only’ 265bhp; these days a hot hatchback has more, and more gears. The Turbo had just four speeds, but the bodywork was widened, the tail spoiler was outrageous and the handling was pretty hairy.

By the time the 964-series 911 arrived in 1989, the 930 Turbo’s power had swollen to 330bhp. The 964 Turbo eventually took this to 355bhp, while that car’s replacement, the 993, was the first to have an even faster Turbo S variant and four-wheel drive.

Since the advent of a four-wheel-drive Porsche 911 Turbo, however, these Porsches have been getting faster, more stable and, you might argue, more sanitised, leaving other 911s to provide the kicks while these forced-induction models deliver the technical highlights in an easy-to-live-with yet apocalyptically fast package.

Think of every modern 911 Turbo as a Porsche 959 realised, if not quite for the masses then at least for a broader subset than were able to buy the limited-run supercar, with all the technology you could hope for and all the daily usability you could need.

Advertisement Back to top

This time there are again two variants of 911 Turbo: the ‘regular’ one and this, the Turbo S. Let’s see if they continue the trend.

Verdict Model tested: Rating: 8

Porsche 911 Turbo 2013-2019

GoodStupendous straight-line speedContinent-crossing comfortLooks the partBadExtravagant priceStability-biased handlingWeaker residuals than other 911s

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *