Open gallery Close by Hilton Holloway 28 January 2012 Follow @@autocar Share
How we test cars
Back in the mid-1990s Peugeot pioneered usable electrical power with vehicles based on the 106 and Citroën Berlingo, before that they took a conventional 205 and simply plugged an electric powertrain within it. None of the cars made headlines, but that was before the overwhelming automotive focus on alternative powertrain vehicles that we’re now faced with.
A decade and a half later, and in more timely fashion, PSA is back with the Peugeot iOn and Citroën C-Zero. It’s effectively a re-badged Mitsubishi i-MiEV, which means a 66bhp electric motor powered by lithium-ion batteries, mounted under the centre of the vehicle, that can be fully recharged in seven hours from a standard 13-amp socket, and giving the 3.5-metre long iOn city car a range of 93 miles.
The iOn is practically identical to the Citroen C-Zero and Mitsubishi i-MiEVHilton HollowayAssociate editor
While the firm is realistic about the potential of electric cars (estimating an EU market share of four to five percent by 2020) it says it hoped to sell around 50,000 iOns by 2015. Unfortunately, that was never likely to be the case, especially with the Nissan Leaf proving to be a more compelling option, while now the market is well supplied with EVs – BMW i3, Volkswagen e-Golf, Hyundai Ioniq and Renault Zoe to name a few.
The iOn offers all the essential things you look for in a city car. It’s got a spacious but compact body, which might look like a Doctor Who prop but is actually very effective at weaving through traffic thanks to its narrow proportions and good visibility. Even the interior is of an acceptable standard by comparison with its conventional rivals. The iOn is a handy 3474mm long but rather narrower than a typical European supermini. Rear-wheel drive contributes to a handy turning circle, too.
Advertisement Back to top
Ride quality is good, with decent body control despite soft springs that soak up all but the worst of the road’s imperfections. Even the steering has an unexpectedly swift and sharp response. The electric motor is not the punchiest powertrain, but there’s enough poke to get it up to 30mph with a certain urgency, and it doesn’t feel out of its depth in free-flowing town traffic provided you’re willing to work the motor hard and compromise your range.
Peugeot iOn 2011-2018 news
PSA eyes Mitsubishi stake PSA eyes Mitsubishi stake
Related Peugeot iOn 2011-2018 reviews
The electric motor’s full torque delivery from standstill, and the lack of individual gear ratios, makes for refined and civilised progress, and in typically clogged rush-hour city traffic, its silent and progressive step-off is actually quite pleasant. Overall, it’s a huge departure from the likes of a G-Wiz, and oddly easy to like for all its challenging looks.
Equipment levels are quite comprehensive, with the iOn getting alloy wheels, tinted rear windows, automatic lights and front foglights on the outside and USB connectivity, Bluetooth, heated driver’s seat and climate control.
Peugeot has decided it will only be offering the iOn on a lease basis on a three-year, 30,000-mile contract, which includes all maintenance and servicing. But that works out as a very expensive way to not own a car with such limited abilities. Peugeot claims that those in central London can save the equivalent amount by running the iOn for those four years instead of a conventional car, but even so there are plenty of flaws in that theory.
The first is the existence of the Nissan Leaf, which may not be such a compact city car but still gets all the same electric car benefits while also being a much more grown-up and usable proposition. And you can own it for not much more than Peugeot is asking you to pay to lease the iOn. Then there is the Renault Zoe which is a much viable option and comes with the benefit of being capable of 250 miles per charge.
It’s clear to see what Peugeot is trying to achieve with its electric car. But even so, with these costs attached to it the iOn could run on fresh air and still be un-recommendable.