Citroen C4 Cactus 2014-2018 review

Open gallery Close by Matt Saunders 24 July 2014 Follow @TheDarkStormy1 Share

How we test cars

With the increasing diversification of the new car market, finding a hitherto untapped niche is no easy thing.

But the Citroën C4 Cactus – which is not a Citroen C4 (we’ll come to that in a moment) and bears little resemblance to a real cactus – is no easy thing to define. The Cactus is such a new thing that the short of the history is this: revealed at the Geneva motor show in March 2014 and on sale for four years, with a somewhat major restyle in 2018.

The Citroën C4 Cactus takes on the crossovers including the Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke and Renault CapturMatt SaundersRoad test editor

There was also a C-Cactus concept — although it didn’t look much like this — in 2007, and before that there have been Citroëns with elements of the Cactus about them.

If you’re looking for inspiration that is affordable and practical, gives a loping drive and is unpretentious, the obvious source material is the 2CV. The Cactus isn’t a successor to that, but it is closer than most.

If there’s anything Cactus-like about the car, it’s the Citroën’s most notable design feature: the soft pads on its flanks. They are, in some manner, like a Cactus’s spikes in that they’re a defence mechanism, but they visually differentiate the Cactus from the pack, too.

They add a ruggedness to the hatchback, although that isn’t backed up by a raised ride height or four-wheel drive.

Throw in an eye-catching price, then, and what do you have? A new niche? A DS-like sub-brand? Just what is its closest rival? We’ll investigate more in a moment, but suffice to say: who else could make this car than the company that brought us the DS and the 2CV?

Advertisement Back to top

But whether our C4 Cactus is as compelling as its name appears to be is something we’ll discover during this review.

Verdict Model tested: Rating: 6

Citroen C4 Cactus 2014-2018

GoodSpacious, clever interiorAlternative charmDistinctive appearanceBadImprecise handlingNot as cheap as it should beMixed cabin quality

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *